January 17, 2008
-
My politricks
Interesting quiz
Here's how I scored unsuprisingly:
If Democrat:
John Edwards (31 pt)
Hillary Clinton (16 pt)
Barak Obama (13pt)This is where I stand on the issues. But if voting, I would always vote against Hillary. Because I think HE is shriller and faker than the other fakes. As if I would every vote Democratic again.
As Republican
John Mccain (16 pt)
Ron Paul (22 pt)
Mike Huckabee (4 pt)
Mitt Romney (9 pt)
Fred Thomson (6 pt)
Rudy Giuliani (4 pt)Well it looks like I'm more Libertarian that I though I'd be. But then the Republican Party has changed with its neo-cons. eww. neo-cons.
Two things for sure. No Child Left Behind has to go. Illegal Immigration has to be dealt with severely.
Honestly, I'm really an Imperialist at heart. I believe we can solve all our problems by conquering weaker nations and stripping them of their resources, colonizing them by eradicating their populations and placing our own citizens where theirs USED to live. We really wouldn't have too much of a terrorist problem if we forget about human rights and torture & execute anyone related to terrorists without trial and just burn their villages down and shoot everyone or take them to our labor camps.
We would do wonders for our economy if we can have a fresh population of "indentureds" to do our menial labor. We could reduce our prison population too. After all, I've always believed that there no resource as renewable and eco-friendly as the "human" resource. Who needs cars when we could have rickshaws and litters. Who needs to worry about a busy schedule to do laundry, mow the lawn, dress, bathe, etc. when we could have our indentureds take care of it for us.
I've always felt that the American delusion of liberty, equality, and human rights have always kept the United States back
from being a real top notch nation and kept it's citizens from the real carefree pleasures, luxuries, and benefits of being the most powerful nation on Earth. Look at what ancient cultures that have embraced this policy had accomplished: Egypt, the Pyramids; China, the Great Wall; Rome, the roads, acquaducts, our western culture; Greece, philosophy & western culture too; Persia, the preservation of ancient knowledge; England, the English language and culture; Mayans & Aztecs, staying the apocolypse with blood sacrifice. I could go on forever.We really should take war seriously for what it is: the tried and true, practical, method to acquire wealth and resources. Wars for ideology, like "democracy " and "freedom," is as best infeasible and at worst dangerously romantic. We really should be at war more often with our rivals (like the EU, Russia, China, Canada) to conquer them and take their resources. Plus, who doesn't like being called "master?"
At least then it would be an honest, undelusional, and un-hypocritcal foreign policy.
Comments (2)
Not sure about the "indentureds" (I hate rickshaws, I like to be in control of the driving, wherever I go), which I'm guessing is but rhetorical flourish anyway, but otherwise I agree, totally. Though I wouldn't mind putting prisoners to work, as they used to, in forms of hard labor, instead of the job-training junk they do now.
And yeah, the Repub party has become less conservative in bad ways, and has become more conservative in bad ways. Democrats have become vastly more liberal. Lots of badness to go around, these days.
Yeah it's all Juvenalian satire for the bottom portion of the post. I wonder just how many readers understand that. But then the one's who don't are just one of the targets of the jab anyway.
I call it "taunting the tiger." It's always fun to taunt the tiger until it gets pissed off, jumps out, and hunts you down. But then the joke is on it right?
Maybe taunting the baboon is better. I like throwing nuts at them and then watch them get excited bouncing around--just like people who read satire and think it is for real then get all mad and such.
Comments are closed.